Nonverbal communication can be observed and therefore validated or disavowed on the basis of scientific criteria. For example, if we say of a person that she experiences a positive emotion, her lower eyelid is always retracted or elevated (referring to the muscle under the eye). It is therefore impossible to discern the whiteness of the eye under the iris. There is no mistake: it is true or false. To prove the veracity or falsity of this proposal we will need a stock of video clips of people being very excited for positive reasons. If, in addition to one in ten videos, the white of the lower eye is visible, the synergological proposal is invalidated. For its veracity to be total, it would then be necessary to compare these images with expressions in which the eyes are sad, by observing precisely how the lower eyelid of the sad eye shows the lower white of the eye, which is very visible. On this basis, we do not hesitate to say that in the field of reading nonverbal communication, there are charlatans simply because their proposals have not gone through thiscontrol barrier , saying some things that are true, but unable to demonstrate it formally. In training courses, specialists in synergology will show you numerous proofs of the legitimacy of this discipline of the human sciences. Whenever the opportunity arises, a new proposal is proposed to scientists. This is what the code of ethics for synergology (AQS and AES) suggests.
Recent knowledge in neuroscience is of great importance in the development of synergology and has given meaning to a structurally different way of approaching body language. Based on how the brain works the method can decrypt the body language in a very effective and reliable way. The synergologist verifies his results according to scientific criteria and provable. The goal in synergology is to have a better understanding of communication and to check its acceptances and has proved to be very valuable where the goal is to improve performance in communication skills and non-verbal language. The goal is to improve synergology to decipher the functioning of the human brain through body language.
Synergology, more commonly called body language science, has recognized the findings of some researchers in accordance with the observations of “Palo Alto School,” the findings of Ray Birdwhistell, Edward T. Hall, Gregory Bateson, Paul Watzlawick but he also founded his own theory on the basis of this school of thought. The Palo Alto trend is to bring together all the contradictions between verbal and non-verbal language. Synergology recognizes that non-verbal language is solely responsible for these contradictions, that non-verbal language can have a dual meaning. Synergologists can decode all bodily behaviors without using sound. This undoubtedly proves that body language alone can sometimes be contradictory.
Synergology introduces new concepts in the non-verbal domain, from the observation of bodily reactions that had never been isolated and which had been described until now as being micro-movements. The last contribution in neuroscience was decisive on the progression of synergology. The assumptions on which it relies indeed to find their thanks scientific substrates for the intensification and confirmation of new data from neurobiology and neuropsychology. Because of this amazing discovery, every physical gesture will require some activity in the brain, thus eliminating any contradiction through the bodily movement. This allows nonverbal communication and body language to be observed in a new semantic field. These micro-movements of the body lange appear when one fills the comments which contradict the openly expressed information. This astounding discovery places body language as an essential witness of the activity of the mind that clarifies these contradictions by translating them on the body. It allows nonverbal communication to be observed in a new semantic field.